BMNR vs. NLR
BMNR (BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Over the past year, BMNR returned 187.25% vs 18.72% for NLR. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BMNR vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNR achieves a -40.66% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's -1.81% return.
BMNR
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -23.94%
- YTD
- -40.66%
- 6M
- -53.79%
- 1Y
- 187.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLR
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -10.59%
- YTD
- -1.81%
- 6M
- -3.70%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- 29.88%
- 5Y*
- 19.78%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
BMNR vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNR BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. | -40.66% | 274.59% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -1.81% | 29.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNR and NLR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNR vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
BMNR
NLR
BMNR vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMNR | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +7.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.97 | 1.10 | +0.87 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 0.63 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.56 | 1.41 | +1.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNR vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNR drawdown since its inception was -88.41%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNR and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNR | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.41% | -65.05% | -23.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -88.41% | -29.72% | -58.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.06% | -25.81% | -62.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.84% | -35.70% | -35.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 73.42% | 13.33% | +60.09% |
Volatility
BMNR vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) has a higher volatility of 22.82% compared to VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) at 13.73%. This indicates that BMNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNR | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.82% | 13.73% | +9.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.99% | 33.75% | +27.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 717.57% | 42.85% | +674.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 710.73% | 29.56% | +681.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 710.73% | 24.22% | +686.51% |
Dividends
BMNR vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
BMNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than NLR's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMNR BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.60% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNR and NLR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMNR has higher volatility (22.82%) compared to NLR (13.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMNR dropped -88.41% vs NLR's -65.05%.
NLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMNR and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer