BMNG vs. QTJL

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BMNG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

BMNG vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMNG achieves a -83.14% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 4.97% return.

BMNG

• 1D: -4.71%
• 1M: -22.33%
• 6M: -86.67%
• YTD: -83.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTJL

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -1.99%
• 6M: 3.87%
• YTD: 4.97%
• 1Y: 14.88%
• 3Y*: 17.19%
• 5Y*: 9.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNG vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	-83.14%	-80.50%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	4.97%	1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BMNG and QTJL is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

BMNG vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMNG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 59
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMNG vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BMNG	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.43	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.03	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.24	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.30	—

Drawdowns

BMNG vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNG drawdown since its inception was -97.32%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNG and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMNG	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.32%	-33.40%	-63.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.43%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.86%	-2.39%	-94.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-83.13%	-7.78%	-75.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.32%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BMNG	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.81%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	185.89%	10.50%	+175.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	185.89%	20.33%	+165.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	185.89%	20.27%	+165.62%

BMNG vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMNG vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither BMNG nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMNG and QTJL in my portfolio?

BMNG and QTJL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BMNG or QTJL?

On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMNG or QTJL?

BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BMNG or QTJL?

BMNG and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BMNG and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BMNG and 0.79% for QTJL.