BMNG vs. QTAP
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP).
BMNG and QTAP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BMNG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Oct 27, 2025. QTAP is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.
Performance
BMNG vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BMNG vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | -61.95% | -81.37% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 3.02% | 1.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNG achieves a -61.95% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 3.02% return.
BMNG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -15.09%
- YTD
- -61.95%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 21.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BMNG vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BMNG vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
BMNG
QTAP
BMNG vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMNG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | 0.64 | -1.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNG and QTAP is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BMNG vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither BMNG nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BMNG vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNG drawdown since its inception was -93.85%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNG and QTAP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.85% | -29.44% | -64.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.91% | 0.00% | -92.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.97% | -5.21% | -71.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.68% | — |
Volatility
BMNG vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BMNG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 214.47% | 16.38% | +198.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 214.47% | 19.03% | +195.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 214.47% | 19.03% | +195.44% |