BMNG vs. FNGD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) and FNGD (MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BMNG is actively managed, while FNGD is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. BMNG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FNGD.

Performance

BMNG vs. FNGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMNG achieves a -75.13% return, which is significantly lower than FNGD's -41.82% return.

BMNG

• 1D: -12.21%
• 1M: -48.30%
• YTD: -75.13%
• 6M: -85.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNGD

• 1D: 3.34%
• 1M: -28.48%
• YTD: -41.82%
• 6M: -33.35%
• 1Y: -60.64%
• 3Y*: -69.29%
• 5Y*: -65.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNG vs. FNGD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	-75.13%	-81.37%
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-41.82%	17.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BMNG and FNGD is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	-0.48

Return for Risk

BMNG vs. FNGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGD

FNGD Risk / Return Rank: 1
FNGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FNGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FNGD Omega Ratio Rank: 1
FNGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FNGD Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMNG vs. FNGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMNG	FNGD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-1.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.52	-0.78	+0.26

Drawdowns

BMNG vs. FNGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNG drawdown since its inception was -95.36%, roughly equal to the maximum FNGD drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNG and FNGD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMNG	FNGD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.36%	-100.00%	+4.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-65.92%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-97.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-99.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.36%	-100.00%	+4.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.38%	-87.25%	+5.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	32.99%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BMNG	FNGD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.47%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.91%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	191.58%	58.70%	+132.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	191.58%	88.78%	+102.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	191.58%	91.00%	+100.58%

BMNG vs. FNGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMNG vs. FNGD - Dividend Comparison

Neither BMNG nor FNGD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMNG and FNGD in my portfolio?

BMNG and FNGD have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BMNG or FNGD?

On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMNG or FNGD?

BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FNGD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BMNG or FNGD?

BMNG and FNGD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BMNG and FNGD?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BMNG and 0.95% for FNGD.