PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMNG vs. BLSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BMNG vs. BLSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BMNG vs. BLSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMNG achieves a -61.95% return, which is significantly lower than BLSG's -27.67% return.


BMNG

1D
0.00%
1M
-15.09%
YTD
-61.95%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLSG

1D
-4.07%
1M
1.86%
YTD
-27.67%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BMNG vs. BLSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BMNG and BLSG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

BMNG vs. BLSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BMNG vs. BLSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMNGBLSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.47

-0.65

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between BMNG and BLSG is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BMNG vs. BLSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BMNG nor BLSG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BMNG vs. BLSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNG drawdown since its inception was -93.85%, which is greater than BLSG's maximum drawdown of -83.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNG and BLSG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BMNGBLSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.85%

-83.67%

-10.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.91%

-71.07%

-21.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.97%

-57.53%

-19.44%

Volatility

BMNG vs. BLSG - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BMNGBLSGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

214.47%

145.91%

+68.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

214.47%

145.91%

+68.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

214.47%

145.91%

+68.56%