PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMNG vs. ARMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMNG vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMNG achieves a -72.19% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 841.05% return.


BMNG

1D
11.82%
1M
-43.79%
YTD
-72.19%
6M
-85.64%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMG

1D
-9.19%
1M
211.14%
YTD
841.05%
6M
460.44%
1Y
443.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNG vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BMNG
Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF
-72.19%-81.37%
ARMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF
841.05%-64.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BMNG and ARMG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMNG vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMNG

ARMG
ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMNG vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BMNG vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMNGARMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.52

1.10

-1.62

Drawdowns

BMNG vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNG drawdown since its inception was -95.36%, which is greater than ARMG's maximum drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNG and ARMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMNGARMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.36%

-80.28%

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.82%

-9.19%

-85.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.47%

-52.91%

-28.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.55%

Volatility

BMNG vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMNGARMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

66.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

104.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

191.69%

130.67%

+61.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

191.69%

138.36%

+53.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

191.69%

138.36%

+53.33%

BMNG vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BMNG and ARMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

BMNG vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

BMNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BMNG and ARMG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BMNG and ARMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for BMNG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMNG and ARMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer