PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMED vs. DYNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BMED vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Future Health ETF (BMED) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BMED vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BMED
Future Health ETF
-4.58%21.79%1.55%5.70%-19.69%-3.96%17.86%
DYNF
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
-3.16%20.00%30.29%36.25%-20.27%22.12%12.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMED achieves a -4.58% return, which is significantly lower than DYNF's -3.16% return.


BMED

1D
2.68%
1M
-6.75%
YTD
-4.58%
6M
7.95%
1Y
19.34%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
0.33%
10Y*

DYNF

1D
0.95%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
-3.16%
6M
-0.32%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
23.07%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BMED vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMED has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DYNF's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BMED vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMED
BMED Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMED Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMED Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

DYNF
DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMED vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Future Health ETF (BMED) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMEDDYNFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

1.17

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.54

1.73

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.90

-0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.06

8.99

-3.93

BMED vs. DYNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMED Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the DYNF Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMED and DYNF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMEDDYNFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.17

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.75

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.73

-0.60

Correlation

The correlation between BMED and DYNF is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BMED vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison

BMED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
BMED
Future Health ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DYNF
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
1.02%1.01%0.65%1.11%1.66%2.89%1.52%1.22%

Drawdowns

BMED vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMED drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, roughly equal to the maximum DYNF drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMED and DYNF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BMEDDYNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.44%

-34.72%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-11.45%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.90%

-28.65%

-5.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.60%

-4.94%

-5.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.30%

-6.11%

-13.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

2.42%

+1.25%

Volatility

BMED vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison

Future Health ETF (BMED) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) at 5.59%. This indicates that BMED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DYNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BMEDDYNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

5.59%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

10.02%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.25%

18.21%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

17.49%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.82%

20.05%

-2.23%