PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMED vs. ARKG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BMED vs. ARKG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Future Health ETF (BMED) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BMED vs. ARKG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BMED
Future Health ETF
-4.26%21.79%1.55%5.70%-19.69%-3.96%17.86%
ARKG
ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF
-6.49%23.04%-28.24%16.22%-53.90%-33.92%45.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMED achieves a -4.26% return, which is significantly higher than ARKG's -6.49% return.


BMED

1D
0.34%
1M
-5.51%
YTD
-4.26%
6M
5.68%
1Y
22.21%
3Y*
7.39%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*

ARKG

1D
2.54%
1M
-9.43%
YTD
-6.49%
6M
-6.10%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
-3.42%
5Y*
-21.16%
10Y*
4.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BMED vs. ARKG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMED has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BMED vs. ARKG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMED
BMED Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMED Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMED Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKG
ARKG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
ARKG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMED vs. ARKG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Future Health ETF (BMED) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMEDARKGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

0.77

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

1.38

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.16

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.11

+0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.45

2.98

+2.47

BMED vs. ARKG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMED Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the ARKG Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMED and ARKG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMEDARKGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

0.77

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

-0.47

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.08

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between BMED and ARKG is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BMED vs. ARKG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BMED nor ARKG has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMED
Future Health ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ARKG
ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.62%0.85%3.14%0.82%1.34%

Drawdowns

BMED vs. ARKG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMED drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, smaller than the maximum ARKG drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMED and ARKG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BMEDARKGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.44%

-83.59%

+47.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-27.51%

+15.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.90%

-80.18%

+46.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.30%

-75.76%

+65.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.30%

-35.32%

+16.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

10.24%

-6.62%

Volatility

BMED vs. ARKG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Future Health ETF (BMED) is 5.98%, while ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) has a volatility of 13.41%. This indicates that BMED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BMEDARKGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

13.41%

-7.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

31.90%

-21.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.24%

44.84%

-26.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.42%

45.39%

-27.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.81%

40.94%

-23.13%