BMED vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BMED (Future Health ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BMED is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. BMED is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BMED returned -1.08%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for VOO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BMED charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

BMED vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Future Health ETF (BMED) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMED achieves a -5.53% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.75% return.

BMED

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: -5.53%
• 6M: -6.79%
• 1Y: 18.30%
• 3Y*: 5.25%
• 5Y*: -1.08%
• 10Y*: —

VOO

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 6M: 9.30%
• 1Y: 26.77%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: 13.58%
• 10Y*: 15.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMED vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BMED Future Health ETF	-5.53%	21.79%	1.55%	5.70%	-19.69%	-3.96%	17.62%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	9.75%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	12.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BMED and VOO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2020	0.69

The correlation between BMED and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BMED vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BMED	VOO
Healthcare	100.0%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	4.5%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Communication Services	-	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.8%
Energy	-	3.2%
Financial Services	-	10.9%
Industrials	-	7.6%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Technology	-	39.1%
Utilities	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

BMED vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMED

BMED Risk / Return Rank: 30
BMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
BMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
BMED Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
BMED Martin Ratio Rank: 23

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 68
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMED vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Future Health ETF (BMED) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BMED	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	2.17	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	2.93	-1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.39	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	3.02	-1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.91	13.58	-10.67

BMED vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMED Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMED and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BMED vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMED drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMED and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMED	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.44%	-33.99%	-2.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.85%	-8.90%	-5.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.12%	-18.69%	-1.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.90%	-24.52%	-9.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.49%	-1.74%	-9.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.02%	-3.68%	-15.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.31%	1.98%	+4.33%

Volatility

BMED vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Future Health ETF (BMED) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 4.74% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BMED	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.74%	4.60%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.37%	9.73%	+1.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.41%	12.39%	+3.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.45%	16.90%	+0.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.74%	18.05%	-0.31%

BMED vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMED has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMED vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

BMED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than VOO's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMED Future Health ETF	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.04%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMED and VOO in my portfolio?

BMED and VOO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BMED or VOO?

BMED has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMED dropped -36.44% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which ETF is better, BMED or VOO?

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.58% vs -1.08% for BMED. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BMED or VOO?

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.58% return vs -1.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMED or VOO?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BMED.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BMED or VOO?

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.28% for BMED.

What is the main difference between BMED and VOO?

BMED is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BMED and 0.03% for VOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.