PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMAY vs. SMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMAY vs. SMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (BMAY) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMAY achieves a 5.94% return, which is significantly higher than SMAX's 3.09% return.


BMAY

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.01%
YTD
5.94%
6M
6.79%
1Y
15.18%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*

SMAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.09%
YTD
3.09%
6M
3.54%
1Y
9.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMAY vs. SMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BMAY
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
5.94%11.16%2.65%
SMAX
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF
3.09%8.01%1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BMAY and SMAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.82

The correlation between BMAY and SMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMAY vs. SMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMAY
BMAY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
BMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SMAX
SMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMAY vs. SMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (BMAY) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMAYSMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.75

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.17

4.81

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.22

26.11

+4.11

BMAY vs. SMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is comparable to the SMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMAY and SMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMAYSMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

3.46

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

2.01

-1.00

Drawdowns

BMAY vs. SMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMAY drawdown since its inception was -17.66%, which is greater than SMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAY and SMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMAYSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.66%

-3.90%

-13.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.95%

-1.91%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.09%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-0.40%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

0.35%

+0.15%

Volatility

BMAY vs. SMAX - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (BMAY) has a higher volatility of 1.65% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX) at 0.38%. This indicates that BMAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMAYSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

0.38%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.04%

2.10%

+1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.26%

2.67%

+2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.27%

3.67%

+7.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.99%

3.67%

+7.32%

BMAY vs. SMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMAY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMAY vs. SMAX - Dividend Comparison

BMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


PositionTTM20252024
BMAY
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMAX
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF
0.95%0.98%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMAY and SMAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMAY has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to SMAX (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMAY dropped -17.66% vs SMAX's -3.90%.

On 1-year performance, BMAY leads with 15.18% vs 9.17% for SMAX. On fees, SMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BMAY has performed better with a 15.18% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BMAY.

SMAX has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for BMAY.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BMAY and 0.50% for SMAX.

SMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 2.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMAY and SMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer