BMAY vs. SFLR
BMAY (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BMAY is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index, while SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. BMAY is passively managed, while SFLR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BMAY returned 15.44%/yr vs 16.02%/yr for SFLR. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BMAY charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SFLR.
Performance
BMAY vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMAY achieves a 5.94% return, which is significantly higher than SFLR's 5.55% return.
BMAY
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 5.94%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 15.18%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- —
SFLR
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 19.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMAY vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMAY Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May | 5.94% | 11.16% | 19.06% | 16.73% | 2.00% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 5.55% | 13.29% | 19.99% | 21.20% | 1.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMAY and SFLR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022 | 0.90 |
The correlation between BMAY and SFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
BMAY vs. SFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BMAY
SFLR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BMAY
SFLR
Financial Services
BMAY
SFLR
Communication Services
BMAY
SFLR
Consumer Cyclical
BMAY
SFLR
Healthcare
BMAY
SFLR
Industrials
BMAY
SFLR
Consumer Defensive
BMAY
SFLR
Energy
BMAY
SFLR
Utilities
BMAY
SFLR
Real Estate
BMAY
SFLR
Basic Materials
BMAY
SFLR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMAY vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank
BMAY
SFLR
BMAY vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (BMAY) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BMAY | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.90 | 2.20 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.44 | 2.98 | +1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.42 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.17 | 2.87 | +2.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.22 | 11.73 | +18.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMAY | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.90 | 2.20 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 1.71 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
BMAY vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMAY drawdown since its inception was -17.66%, which is greater than SFLR's maximum drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAY and SFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMAY | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.66% | -12.13% | -5.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.95% | -6.79% | +3.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.75% | -12.13% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.38% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -1.74% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 1.66% | -1.16% |
Volatility
BMAY vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (BMAY) is 1.65%, while Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) has a volatility of 1.87%. This indicates that BMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMAY | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.65% | 1.87% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.04% | 6.46% | -2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.26% | 8.89% | -3.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.27% | 10.15% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.99% | 10.15% | +0.84% |
BMAY vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMAY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMAY vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison
BMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMAY Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.32% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMAY and SFLR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFLR has higher volatility (1.87%) compared to BMAY (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMAY dropped -17.66% vs SFLR's -12.13%.
On 3-year performance, SFLR leads with 16.02% vs 15.44% for BMAY. On fees, BMAY is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BMAY has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SFLR has performed better with a 16.02% return vs 15.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BMAY is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.
SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for BMAY.
BMAY is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SFLR is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BMAY and 0.89% for SFLR.
BMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMAY and SFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer