BMAY vs. PSMR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BMAY (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May) and PSMR (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. BMAY is passively managed, while PSMR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BMAY returned 8.67%/yr vs 8.36%/yr for PSMR. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BMAY charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for PSMR.

Performance

BMAY vs. PSMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (BMAY) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMAY achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly lower than PSMR's 7.36% return.

BMAY

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: -0.64%
• YTD: 4.58%
• 6M: 4.62%
• 1Y: 12.76%
• 3Y*: 14.48%
• 5Y*: 8.67%
• 10Y*: —

PSMR

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 7.36%
• 6M: 7.40%
• 1Y: 13.87%
• 3Y*: 11.26%
• 5Y*: 8.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMAY vs. PSMR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BMAY Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	4.58%	11.16%	19.06%	16.73%	-12.54%	9.45%
PSMR Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF	7.36%	6.74%	11.99%	16.85%	-4.11%	7.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BMAY and PSMR is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021	0.91

The correlation between BMAY and PSMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BMAY vs. PSMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMAY

BMAY Risk / Return Rank: 83
BMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
BMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 85
BMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
BMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 93

PSMR

PSMR Risk / Return Rank: 97
PSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMAY vs. PSMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (BMAY) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BMAY	PSMR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	3.87	-1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	6.46	-3.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.86	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.35	12.79	-8.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.96	60.28	-38.32

BMAY vs. PSMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the PSMR Sharpe Ratio of 3.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMAY and PSMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BMAY vs. PSMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMAY drawdown since its inception was -17.66%, which is greater than PSMR's maximum drawdown of -11.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAY and PSMR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMAY	PSMR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.66%	-11.78%	-5.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.95%	-1.09%	-1.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.75%	-11.78%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.66%	-11.78%	-5.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-0.56%	-1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.07%	-1.65%	-1.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.58%	0.23%	+0.35%

Volatility

BMAY vs. PSMR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (BMAY) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) at 1.44%. This indicates that BMAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BMAY	PSMR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	1.44%	+1.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.02%	2.79%	+2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.87%	3.62%	+2.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.34%	8.50%	+2.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.01%	8.39%	+2.62%

BMAY vs. PSMR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMAY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PSMR's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMAY vs. PSMR - Dividend Comparison

Neither BMAY nor PSMR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMAY and PSMR in my portfolio?

BMAY and PSMR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BMAY or PSMR?

BMAY has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to PSMR (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMAY dropped -17.66% vs PSMR's -11.78%.

Which ETF is better, BMAY or PSMR?

On 5-year performance, BMAY leads with 8.67% vs 8.36% for PSMR. On fees, PSMR is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, PSMR has been the lower-risk option at 1.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BMAY or PSMR?

Over the 5-year period, BMAY has performed better with a 8.67% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMAY or PSMR?

PSMR is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BMAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BMAY or PSMR?

BMAY and PSMR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BMAY and PSMR?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BMAY and 0.61% for PSMR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.