PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMAY vs. PJAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BMAY vs. PJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (BMAY) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BMAY vs. PJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BMAY
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
0.13%11.16%19.06%16.73%-12.54%11.76%17.82%
PJAN
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January
-1.89%11.29%13.45%18.18%-5.29%8.80%15.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMAY achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly higher than PJAN's -1.89% return.


BMAY

1D
1.80%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
0.13%
6M
2.40%
1Y
13.12%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*

PJAN

1D
1.72%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
-1.89%
6M
0.73%
1Y
11.24%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
7.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BMAY vs. PJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BMAY and PJAN have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

BMAY vs. PJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMAY
BMAY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

PJAN
PJAN Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMAY vs. PJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (BMAY) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMAYPJANDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

1.14

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

1.73

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

1.57

-0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.23

8.51

-0.28

BMAY vs. PJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the PJAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMAY and PJAN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMAYPJANDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.14

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.88

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.81

+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between BMAY and PJAN is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BMAY vs. PJAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither BMAY nor PJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BMAY vs. PJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMAY drawdown since its inception was -17.66%, smaller than the maximum PJAN drawdown of -21.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAY and PJAN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BMAYPJANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.66%

-21.25%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.94%

-7.35%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.66%

-11.93%

-5.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-2.95%

+1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-1.76%

-1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.36%

+0.31%

Volatility

BMAY vs. PJAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (BMAY) is 3.07%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) has a volatility of 3.24%. This indicates that BMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BMAYPJANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

3.24%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.08%

4.59%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

9.87%

+2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.31%

8.91%

+2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.11%

10.69%

+0.42%