PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BMAX.TO vs. AOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

BMAX.TO vs. AOR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BMAX.TO (Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF) and AOR (iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 3 years, BMAX.TO returned 19.11%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for AOR. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BMAX.TO charges 2.62%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AOR.

Performance

BMAX.TO vs. AOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) and iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BMAX.TO is traded in CAD, while AOR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AOR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMAX.TO achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than AOR's 9.13% return.

BMAX.TO

1D
0.89%
1M
4.57%
YTD
10.24%
6M
10.69%
1Y
23.36%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

AOR

1D
0.34%
1M
4.72%
YTD
9.13%
6M
7.77%
1Y
21.15%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10.08%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMAX.TO vs. AOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BMAX.TO
Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF		10.24%17.88%19.42%11.56%6.10%
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF		9.13%11.10%20.19%13.20%4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BMAX.TO and AOR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2022

0.60

The correlation between BMAX.TO and AOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

BMAX.TO vs. AOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
BMAX.TO
AOR

Financial Services

24.1%
16.2%

Technology

18.8%
27.8%

Healthcare

17.0%
8.0%

Industrials

13.0%
11.9%

Energy

7.0%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.0%

Utilities

4.4%
2.7%

Communication Services

4.3%
8.1%

Basic Materials

2.6%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
9.5%

Real Estate

1.3%
2.4%

Financial Services

BMAX.TO
24.1%
AOR
16.2%

Technology

BMAX.TO
18.8%
AOR
27.8%

Healthcare

BMAX.TO
17.0%
AOR
8.0%

Industrials

BMAX.TO
13.0%
AOR
11.9%

Energy

BMAX.TO
7.0%
AOR
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

BMAX.TO
4.9%
AOR
5.0%

Utilities

BMAX.TO
4.4%
AOR
2.7%

Communication Services

BMAX.TO
4.3%
AOR
8.1%

Basic Materials

BMAX.TO
2.6%
AOR
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BMAX.TO
2.6%
AOR
9.5%

Real Estate

BMAX.TO
1.3%
AOR
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

Often compared with BMAX.TO:
BMAX.TO vs. HDIV.TOBMAX.TO vs. UTES.TOBMAX.TO vs. ZWQT.TOBMAX.TO vs. CLSA.TOBMAX.TO vs. BANK.TOBMAX.TO vs. HUTE.TOBMAX.TO vs. HDIF.TO
Often compared with AOR:
AOR vs. AOAAOR vs. AOMAOR vs. VOOAOR vs. FFNOXAOR vs. SPYAOR vs. SCHDAOR vs. GAL

Return for Risk

BMAX.TO vs. AOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BMAX.TO
BMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
AOR
AOR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMAX.TO vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) and iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

BMAX.TOAORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.20
2.57

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.15
3.61

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.51

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

3.75

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.01

14.96

-3.94

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BMAX.TO vs. AOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the AOR Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMAX.TO and AOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

BMAX.TOAORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.57

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

1.15

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

1.02

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

1.15

+0.25

Drawdowns

BMAX.TO vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, smaller than the maximum AOR drawdown of -16.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAX.TO and AOR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

BMAX.TOAORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.42%

-16.69%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-5.66%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-10.11%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-16.69%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-16.69%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.90%

-2.31%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.42%

+0.71%

Volatility

BMAX.TO vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison

Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) at 2.52%. This indicates that BMAX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

BMAX.TOAORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

2.52%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.84%

6.72%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.65%

8.27%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

8.77%

+4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.13%

9.10%

+4.03%

BMAX.TO vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMAX.TO has a 2.62% expense ratio, which is higher than AOR's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMAX.TO vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison

BMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.51%, more than AOR's 2.46% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF		2.46%2.55%2.66%2.50%2.12%1.64%1.89%2.56%2.49%4.51%2.16%2.12%
BMAX.TO
Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF		9.51%9.70%9.64%9.55%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

BMAX.TO and AOR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AOR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AOR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 2.62% for BMAX.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Brompton Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 2.62% for BMAX.TO and 0.15% for AOR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMAX.TO and AOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer