BLUX vs. FNDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BLUX (Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLUX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Bluemonte, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

BLUX vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUX achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.

BLUX

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 12.94%
• 6M: 12.67%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNDX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 3.88%
• YTD: 14.57%
• 6M: 14.58%
• 1Y: 32.32%
• 3Y*: 20.90%
• 5Y*: 12.82%
• 10Y*: 14.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUX vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLUX Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF	12.94%	11.82%
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	14.57%	14.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUX and FNDX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.89

BLUX vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLUX	FNDX
Technology	24.5%	19.1%
Financial Services	14.8%	14.1%
Healthcare	12.0%	12.0%
Industrials	11.8%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	9.2%
Communication Services	6.6%	10.1%
Energy	5.1%	10.3%
Real Estate	4.9%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	7.4%
Basic Materials	3.5%	3.7%
Utilities	2.8%	3.2%

Return for Risk

BLUX vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDX

FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLUX vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLUX	FNDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.02	0.79	+1.23

Drawdowns

BLUX vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUX drawdown since its inception was -9.03%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUX and FNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLUX	FNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.03%	-37.72%	+28.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.06%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-0.13%	-0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-3.55%	+2.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLUX	FNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.25%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.91%	10.22%	+3.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	15.18%	-1.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.91%	17.50%	-3.59%

BLUX vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BLUX and FNDX have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BLUX vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

BLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLUX Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF	0.84%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	1.45%	1.63%	1.76%	1.82%	2.07%	1.64%	2.29%	2.23%	2.40%	1.86%	2.01%	2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLUX and FNDX in my portfolio?

BLUX and FNDX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLUX or FNDX?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLUX or FNDX?

BLUX and FNDX have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLUX or FNDX?

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.84% for BLUX.

What is the main difference between BLUX and FNDX?

BLUX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Charles Schwab.