PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLUX vs. CNAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLUX vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUX achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 47.26% return.


BLUX

1D
-0.82%
1M
4.19%
YTD
12.94%
6M
12.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CNAV

1D
1.11%
1M
21.60%
YTD
47.26%
6M
48.02%
1Y
72.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUX vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BLUX
Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF
12.94%11.82%
CNAV
Mohr Company Nav ETF
47.26%17.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUX and CNAV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.76

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLUX vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLUX

CNAV
CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLUX vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLUX vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLUXCNAVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.02

1.62

+0.40

Drawdowns

BLUX vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUX drawdown since its inception was -9.03%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUX and CNAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLUXCNAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.03%

-30.06%

+21.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

0.00%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-5.42%

+4.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

Volatility

BLUX vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLUXCNAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

25.08%

-11.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

27.16%

-13.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.91%

27.16%

-13.25%

BLUX vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLUX vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

BLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
BLUX
Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF
0.84%0.73%
CNAV
Mohr Company Nav ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLUX and CNAV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BLUX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLUX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

BLUX has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BLUX and 1.31% for CNAV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLUX and CNAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer