BLUX vs. BLUC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BLUX (Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF) and BLUC (Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Bluemonte. Over the past year, BLUX returned 26.50% vs 21.74% for BLUC. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLUX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BLUC.

Performance

BLUX vs. BLUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUX achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly higher than BLUC's 6.76% return.

BLUX

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: 1.21%
• YTD: 13.12%
• 6M: 11.59%
• 1Y: 26.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLUC

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: -1.92%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 6M: 5.79%
• 1Y: 21.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUX vs. BLUC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLUX Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF	13.12%	12.62%
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF	6.76%	14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUX and BLUC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.87

The correlation between BLUX and BLUC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

BLUX vs. BLUC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLUX	BLUC
Technology	26.7%	42.4%
Financial Services	14.1%	9.2%
Industrials	12.0%	7.1%
Healthcare	11.6%	7.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	10.5%
Communication Services	6.6%	12.9%
Real Estate	4.8%	1.6%
Energy	4.6%	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	3.7%
Basic Materials	3.4%	1.4%
Utilities	2.6%	1.5%

Return for Risk

BLUX vs. BLUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLUX

BLUX Risk / Return Rank: 64
BLUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BLUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BLUX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BLUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BLUX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

BLUC

BLUC Risk / Return Rank: 49
BLUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
BLUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
BLUC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
BLUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
BLUC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLUX vs. BLUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLUX	BLUC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.61	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	2.21	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.29	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	2.04	+0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.23	8.39	+3.84

BLUX vs. BLUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the BLUC Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLUX and BLUC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLUX vs. BLUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUX drawdown since its inception was -9.03%, smaller than the maximum BLUC drawdown of -10.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUX and BLUC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLUX	BLUC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.03%	-10.69%	+1.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.03%	-10.69%	+1.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-4.56%	+3.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.31%	-1.61%	+0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	2.60%	-0.43%

Volatility

BLUX vs. BLUC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) is 4.84%, while Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that BLUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLUC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLUX	BLUC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	5.38%	-0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.93%	10.88%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.24%	13.58%	+0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.24%	13.58%	+0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.24%	13.58%	+0.66%

BLUX vs. BLUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BLUC's 0.23% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BLUX vs. BLUC - Dividend Comparison

BLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than BLUC's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF	0.52%	0.46%
BLUX Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF	0.84%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLUX and BLUC in my portfolio?

BLUX and BLUC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLUX or BLUC?

BLUC has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to BLUX (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLUX dropped -9.03% vs BLUC's -10.69%.

Which ETF is better, BLUX or BLUC?

On 1-year performance, BLUX leads with 26.50% vs 21.74% for BLUC. On fees, BLUC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, BLUX has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLUX or BLUC?

Over the 1-year period, BLUX has performed better with a 26.50% return vs 21.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLUX or BLUC?

BLUC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for BLUX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLUX or BLUC?

BLUX has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.52% for BLUC.

What is the main difference between BLUX and BLUC?

Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BLUX and 0.23% for BLUC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.