BLUX vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BLUX (Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, BLUX returned 25.14% vs 10.74% for BDGS. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLUX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

BLUX vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUX achieves a 13.19% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 3.92% return.

BLUX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 13.19%
• 6M: 11.30%
• 1Y: 25.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -1.40%
• YTD: 3.92%
• 6M: 3.55%
• 1Y: 10.74%
• 3Y*: 13.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUX vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLUX Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF	13.19%	12.62%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	3.92%	7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUX and BDGS is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.67

The correlation between BLUX and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

BLUX vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLUX	BDGS
Technology	26.7%	37.4%
Financial Services	14.1%	9.3%
Industrials	12.0%	6.6%
Healthcare	11.6%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	10.9%
Communication Services	6.6%	16.6%
Real Estate	4.8%	1.5%
Energy	4.6%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	4.1%
Basic Materials	3.4%	1.5%
Utilities	2.6%	1.9%

Return for Risk

BLUX vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLUX

BLUX Risk / Return Rank: 64
BLUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BLUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BLUX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BLUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BLUX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 62
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLUX vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLUX	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.70	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	2.55	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.34	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	2.68	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.60	11.59	+0.01

BLUX vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLUX and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLUX vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUX drawdown since its inception was -9.03%, roughly equal to the maximum BDGS drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUX and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLUX	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.03%	-9.12%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.03%	-4.03%	-5.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-2.44%	+1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.31%	-0.66%	-0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	0.93%	+1.24%

Volatility

BLUX vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 2.30%. This indicates that BLUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLUX	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	2.30%	+2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.92%	5.18%	+5.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.23%	6.35%	+7.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.22%	8.22%	+6.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.22%	8.22%	+6.00%

BLUX vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLUX vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

BLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than BDGS's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
BLUX Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF	0.84%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLUX and BDGS in my portfolio?

BLUX and BDGS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLUX or BDGS?

BLUX has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to BDGS (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLUX dropped -9.03% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, BLUX or BDGS?

On 1-year performance, BLUX leads with 25.14% vs 10.74% for BDGS. On fees, BLUX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLUX or BDGS?

Over the 1-year period, BLUX has performed better with a 25.14% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLUX or BDGS?

BLUX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLUX or BDGS?

BLUX has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.53% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between BLUX and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BLUX and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.