BLUI vs. MANI
BLUI (Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF) and MANI (Man Active Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLUI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MANI.
Performance
BLUI vs. MANI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLUI achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly higher than MANI's 2.59% return.
BLUI
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 3.51%
- 1Y
- 7.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MANI
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 2.59%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLUI vs. MANI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLUI Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF | 3.62% | 1.00% |
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 2.59% | 2.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLUI and MANI is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLUI vs. MANI — Risk / Return Rank
BLUI
MANI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BLUI vs. MANI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI) and Man Active Income ETF (MANI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLUI | MANI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.85 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLUI vs. MANI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLUI drawdown since its inception was -2.43%, which is greater than MANI's maximum drawdown of -1.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUI and MANI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLUI | MANI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.43% | -1.54% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -1.54% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -0.11% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | — | — |
Volatility
BLUI vs. MANI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLUI | MANI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.90% | 2.71% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.90% | 2.71% | +1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.90% | 2.71% | +1.19% |
BLUI vs. MANI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLUI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MANI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLUI vs. MANI - Dividend Comparison
BLUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than MANI's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BLUI Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF | 4.70% | 2.91% |
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 3.22% | 3.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLUI and MANI have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLUI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLUI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MANI.
BLUI has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 3.22% for MANI.
They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BLUI and 0.85% for MANI.
Find the right allocation for BLUI and MANI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer