BLUEX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
BLUEX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jan 10, 1991. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
BLUEX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BLUEX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | -9.67% | 4.45% | 7.24% | 14.35% | -14.30% | 3.22% | 34.74% | 35.34% | -4.91% | -0.73% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLUEX achieves a -9.67% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
BLUEX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -7.41%
- YTD
- -9.67%
- 6M
- -9.53%
- 1Y
- -8.25%
- 3Y*
- 2.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BLUEX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLUEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BLUEX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
BLUEX
SWLGX
BLUEX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLUEX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | 0.66 | -1.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | 1.10 | -2.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.15 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 0.72 | -1.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.67 | 2.51 | -5.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLUEX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 | 0.66 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.56 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.68 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between BLUEX and SWLGX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BLUEX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
BLUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 0.03% | 11.84% | 27.20% | 25.43% | 13.71% | 13.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BLUEX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLUEX drawdown since its inception was -54.27%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUEX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLUEX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.27% | -32.69% | -21.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.19% | -16.16% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.87% | -32.69% | +10.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.55% | -16.16% | +4.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.39% | -7.13% | -6.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 4.62% | -1.14% |
Volatility
BLUEX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) is 3.41%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that BLUEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BLUEX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 5.38% | -1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.23% | 11.82% | -4.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.98% | 22.31% | -11.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.49% | 21.47% | -10.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.57% | 22.78% | -6.21% |