BLUC vs. BLUX
BLUC (Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF) and BLUX (Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Bluemonte. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLUC charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for BLUX.
Performance
BLUC vs. BLUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLUC achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than BLUX's 12.94% return.
BLUC
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLUX
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 12.94%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLUC vs. BLUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF | 10.25% | 14.03% |
BLUX Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF | 12.94% | 11.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLUC and BLUX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.87 |
BLUC vs. BLUX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BLUC
BLUX
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BLUC
BLUX
Communication Services
BLUC
BLUX
Consumer Cyclical
BLUC
BLUX
Financial Services
BLUC
BLUX
Healthcare
BLUC
BLUX
Industrials
BLUC
BLUX
Consumer Defensive
BLUC
BLUX
Energy
BLUC
BLUX
Utilities
BLUC
BLUX
Real Estate
BLUC
BLUX
Basic Materials
BLUC
BLUX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLUC vs. BLUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) and Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLUC | BLUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.11 | 2.02 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
BLUC vs. BLUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLUC drawdown since its inception was -10.69%, which is greater than BLUX's maximum drawdown of -9.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUC and BLUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLUC | BLUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.69% | -9.03% | -1.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -0.82% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.52% | -1.32% | -0.20% |
Volatility
BLUC vs. BLUX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLUC | BLUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.00% | 13.91% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 13.91% | -0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 13.91% | -0.91% |
BLUC vs. BLUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLUC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BLUC vs. BLUX - Dividend Comparison
BLUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than BLUX's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF | 0.51% | 0.46% |
BLUX Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF | 0.84% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLUC and BLUX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLUC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLUC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for BLUX.
BLUX has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.51% for BLUC.
Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLUC and 0.25% for BLUX.
Find the right allocation for BLUC and BLUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer