PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLUC vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLUC vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUC achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.


BLUC

1D
-1.43%
1M
5.44%
YTD
10.25%
6M
10.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.94%
YTD
32.04%
6M
37.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUC vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BLUC
Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF
10.25%11.88%
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
32.04%36.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUC and AFOS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.82

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLUC vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLUC vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLUCAFOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.11

4.35

-2.23

Drawdowns

BLUC vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUC drawdown since its inception was -10.69%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUC and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLUCAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.69%

-11.52%

+0.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-0.29%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-1.37%

-0.15%

Volatility

BLUC vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLUCAFOSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

20.19%

-7.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.00%

20.19%

-7.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.00%

20.19%

-7.19%

BLUC vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLUC vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

BLUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BLUC and AFOS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BLUC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLUC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.

BLUC has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLUC and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLUC and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer