PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLSX vs. QTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLSX vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BLSX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTJL

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.20%
YTD
7.15%
6M
7.91%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLSX vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BLSX and QTJL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLSX vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLSX

QTJL
QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLSX vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLSX vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLSXQTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

Drawdowns

BLSX vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLSXQTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

Volatility

BLSX vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLSXQTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.42%

BLSX vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLSX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLSX vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither BLSX nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BLSX and QTJL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for BLSX.

BLSX and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for BLSX and 0.79% for QTJL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLSX and QTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer