BLST vs. BSV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) and BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past year, BLST returned 3.24% vs 3.18% for BSV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLST charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BSV.

Performance

BLST vs. BSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLST achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly higher than BSV's 0.32% return.

BLST

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 0.35%
• 6M: 0.52%
• 1Y: 3.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSV

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 0.32%
• 6M: 0.51%
• 1Y: 3.18%
• 3Y*: 4.51%
• 5Y*: 1.68%
• 10Y*: 1.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLST vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	0.35%	2.68%
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares	0.32%	3.03%

Correlation

The correlation between BLST and BSV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.92

The correlation between BLST and BSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BLST vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLST

BLST Risk / Return Rank: 44
BLST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
BLST Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
BLST Omega Ratio Rank: 43
BLST Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
BLST Martin Ratio Rank: 41

BSV

BSV Risk / Return Rank: 54
BSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BSV Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
BSV Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLST vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLST	BSV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	1.76	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.76	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.33	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	2.48	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.89	8.14	-2.26

BLST vs. BSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLST Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the BSV Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLST and BSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLST vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLST drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum BSV drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLST and BSV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLST	BSV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-8.54%	+6.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.69%	-1.29%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-8.54%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-8.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-0.60%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.37%	-0.97%	+0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	0.39%	+0.16%

Volatility

BLST vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison

Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) at 0.60%. This indicates that BLST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLST	BSV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.73%	0.60%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.69%	1.33%	+0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.25%	1.82%	+0.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.25%	2.73%	-0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.25%	2.38%	-0.13%

BLST vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLST has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BLST vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison

BLST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than BSV's 3.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	3.38%	2.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares	3.99%	3.83%	3.38%	2.46%	1.50%	1.45%	1.79%	2.29%	1.99%	1.65%	1.48%	1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLST and BSV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, BLST and BSV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BLST or BSV?

BLST has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to BSV (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLST dropped -1.69% vs BSV's -8.54%.

Which ETF is better, BLST or BSV?

On 1-year performance, BLST leads with 3.24% vs 3.18% for BSV. On fees, BSV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BSV has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLST or BSV?

Over the 1-year period, BLST has performed better with a 3.24% return vs 3.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLST or BSV?

BSV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BLST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLST or BSV?

BSV has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 3.38% for BLST.

What is the main difference between BLST and BSV?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLST and 0.03% for BSV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.