PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLSIX vs. ECAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLSIX vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BLSIX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLSIX achieves a 19.25% return, which is significantly higher than ECAT's 11.70% return.


BLSIX

1D
2.02%
1M
-1.71%
6M
9.81%
YTD
19.25%
1Y
35.88%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
6.06%
ALL TIME*
4.10%

ECAT

1D
1.13%
1M
-2.46%
6M
8.98%
YTD
11.70%
1Y
15.34%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$7.83M$7.54M$7.77M

BLSIX vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BLSIX
BlackRock Advantage Emerging Markets Fund
19.25%29.75%6.46%9.36%-21.53%-2.83%
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
11.70%16.64%19.96%32.36%-21.90%-6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BLSIX and ECAT is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021

0.54

The correlation between BLSIX and ECAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLSIX vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BLSIX
BLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

ECAT
ECAT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ECAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ECAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BLSIX vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BLSIX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLSIXECATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.19

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

1.31

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.51

4.74

+2.78

BLSIX vs. ECAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the ECAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLSIX and ECAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLSIX vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLSIX drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, which is greater than ECAT's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLSIX and ECAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLSIXECATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.34%

-32.23%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.18%

-11.80%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-15.79%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.96%

-3.19%

-6.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-8.85%

-3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

3.25%

+1.33%

Volatility

BLSIX vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BLSIX) has a higher volatility of 10.04% compared to BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) at 3.93%. This indicates that BLSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLSIXECATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.04%

3.93%

+6.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.69%

11.29%

+10.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.50%

14.23%

+9.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.41%

16.82%

+1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

16.82%

+1.43%

BLSIX vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLSIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than ECAT's 1.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLSIX vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison

BLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than ECAT's 22.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLSIX
BlackRock Advantage Emerging Markets Fund
1.82%4.54%2.38%1.99%3.89%1.39%1.54%2.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.16%
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
22.06%23.00%17.44%9.14%8.94%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLSIX and ECAT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLSIX has higher volatility (10.04%) compared to ECAT (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLSIX dropped -41.34% vs ECAT's -32.23%.

BLSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLSIX and ECAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer