BLSIX vs. GLLSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BLSIX (BlackRock Advantage Emerging Markets Fund) and GLLSX (abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, BLSIX returned 7.33%/yr vs 15.05%/yr for GLLSX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLSIX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for GLLSX.

Performance

BLSIX vs. GLLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BLSIX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLSIX achieves a 32.44% return, which is significantly lower than GLLSX's 46.58% return. Over the past 10 years, BLSIX has underperformed GLLSX with an annualized return of 7.33%, while GLLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.

BLSIX

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: 11.47%
• YTD: 32.44%
• 6M: 35.64%
• 1Y: 59.08%
• 3Y*: 24.36%
• 5Y*: 6.79%
• 10Y*: 7.33%

GLLSX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 11.34%
• YTD: 46.58%
• 6M: 50.65%
• 1Y: 88.61%
• 3Y*: 29.36%
• 5Y*: 18.30%
• 10Y*: 15.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLSIX vs. GLLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLSIX BlackRock Advantage Emerging Markets Fund	32.44%	29.75%	6.46%	9.36%	-21.53%	-4.24%	16.59%	17.38%	-14.34%	14.68%
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	46.58%	34.81%	0.73%	21.35%	-23.04%	36.50%	15.93%	23.64%	-11.50%	23.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BLSIX and GLLSX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012	0.69

Over the past year, BLSIX and GLLSX have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.69, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

BLSIX vs. GLLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLSIX

BLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 89
BLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
BLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
BLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

GLLSX

GLLSX Risk / Return Rank: 96
GLLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GLLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GLLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
GLLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GLLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLSIX vs. GLLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BLSIX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLSIX	GLLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.28	4.14	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.13	4.78	-0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.74	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.48	6.17	-1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.84	24.54	-6.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BLSIX vs. GLLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLSIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is comparable to the GLLSX Sharpe Ratio of 4.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLSIX and GLLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLSIX	GLLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.28	4.14	-0.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	1.02	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.85	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.69	-0.36

Drawdowns

BLSIX vs. GLLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLSIX drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, which is greater than GLLSX's maximum drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLSIX and GLLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLSIX	GLLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.34%	-32.59%	-8.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.31%	-14.39%	+1.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.91%	-20.95%	+3.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.19%	-30.02%	-9.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.34%	-32.59%	-8.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.08%	-7.92%	-4.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	3.61%	-0.27%

Volatility

BLSIX vs. GLLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BLSIX) is 7.92%, while abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) has a volatility of 9.95%. This indicates that BLSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLSIX	GLLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.92%	9.95%	-2.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.62%	19.05%	-3.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.23%	21.43%	-3.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.30%	18.09%	-0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.60%	17.80%	-0.20%

BLSIX vs. GLLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLSIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than GLLSX's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLSIX vs. GLLSX - Dividend Comparison

BLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than GLLSX's 1.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLSIX BlackRock Advantage Emerging Markets Fund	3.42%	4.54%	2.38%	1.99%	3.89%	1.39%	1.54%	2.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.16%
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	1.28%	1.88%	0.74%	0.77%	29.32%	22.85%	0.00%	3.38%	9.47%	8.40%	1.09%	0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLSIX and GLLSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, BLSIX and GLLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BLSIX or GLLSX?

GLLSX has higher volatility (9.95%) compared to BLSIX (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLSIX dropped -41.34% vs GLLSX's -32.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.14 vs 3.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.