BLSG vs. TFLO
BLSG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) and TFLO (iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLSG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while TFLO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index. BLSG is actively managed, while TFLO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. BLSG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TFLO.
Performance
BLSG vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLSG achieves a -58.79% return, which is significantly lower than TFLO's 1.59% return.
BLSG
- 1D
- -15.77%
- 1M
- -55.27%
- YTD
- -58.79%
- 6M
- -73.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TFLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- 2.37%
BLSG vs. TFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | -58.79% | -60.00% |
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF | 1.59% | 0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLSG and TFLO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLSG vs. TFLO — Risk / Return Rank
BLSG
TFLO
BLSG vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLSG | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 14.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 10.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 5.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | 0.99 | -1.64 |
Drawdowns
BLSG vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLSG drawdown since its inception was -83.67%, which is greater than TFLO's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLSG and TFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLSG | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.67% | -5.01% | -78.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.52% | 0.00% | -83.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.12% | -0.10% | -60.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
BLSG vs. TFLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLSG | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 145.44% | 0.28% | +145.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.44% | 0.35% | +145.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.44% | 0.46% | +144.98% |
BLSG vs. TFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TFLO's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLSG vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison
BLSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF | 3.90% | 4.16% | 5.21% | 4.88% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 2.08% | 1.65% | 0.86% | 0.31% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLSG and TFLO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TFLO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TFLO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BLSG.
TFLO has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 0.00% for BLSG.
BLSG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TFLO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BLSG and 0.15% for TFLO.
Find the right allocation for BLSG and TFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer