PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLPFX vs. RPFCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLPFX vs. RPFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (BLPFX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLPFX achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly lower than RPFCX's 13.51% return. Over the past 10 years, BLPFX has underperformed RPFCX with an annualized return of 8.83%, while RPFCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.60% annualized return.


BLPFX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.19%
6M
3.43%
YTD
6.65%
1Y
13.42%
3Y*
13.09%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
8.83%
ALL TIME*
9.17%

RPFCX

1D
0.57%
1M
2.58%
6M
11.17%
YTD
13.51%
1Y
26.08%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
10.60%
ALL TIME*
8.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BLPFX vs. RPFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLPFX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1
6.65%16.99%11.25%13.80%-13.59%13.75%13.17%19.49%-4.63%16.67%
RPFCX
Davis Appreciation & Income Fund
13.51%20.90%9.10%23.00%-15.65%25.74%4.74%20.33%-8.02%16.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BLPFX and RPFCX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.84

The correlation between BLPFX and RPFCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLPFX vs. RPFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLPFX
BLPFX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BLPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
BLPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

RPFCX
RPFCX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RPFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RPFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLPFX vs. RPFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (BLPFX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLPFXRPFCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.52

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

3.81

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.95

15.18

-7.23

BLPFX vs. RPFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLPFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the RPFCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLPFX and RPFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLPFX vs. RPFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLPFX drawdown since its inception was -23.21%, smaller than the maximum RPFCX drawdown of -56.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLPFX and RPFCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLPFXRPFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.21%

-56.39%

+33.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-6.76%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.36%

-14.82%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.72%

-25.63%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.21%

-30.72%

+7.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

0.00%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-7.40%

+4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.70%

-0.05%

Volatility

BLPFX vs. RPFCX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (BLPFX) has a higher volatility of 1.95% compared to Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) at 1.75%. This indicates that BLPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLPFXRPFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

1.75%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

6.67%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.01%

9.01%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.47%

14.04%

-3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.81%

14.75%

-3.94%

BLPFX vs. RPFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLPFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than RPFCX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLPFX vs. RPFCX - Dividend Comparison

BLPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, more than RPFCX's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLPFX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1
5.76%6.05%3.55%2.24%5.95%4.92%2.52%3.79%4.64%3.44%3.61%3.64%
RPFCX
Davis Appreciation & Income Fund
5.70%6.09%1.11%2.91%2.63%0.28%0.78%2.03%1.09%0.83%1.09%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLPFX and RPFCX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLPFX has higher volatility (1.95%) compared to RPFCX (1.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLPFX dropped -23.21% vs RPFCX's -56.39%.

RPFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLPFX and RPFCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer