PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLPAX vs. TIBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLPAX vs. TIBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLPAX achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than TIBIX's 17.20% return. Over the past 10 years, BLPAX has underperformed TIBIX with an annualized return of 9.17%, while TIBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.65% annualized return.


BLPAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.65%
YTD
7.24%
6M
8.21%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
9.17%

TIBIX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.98%
YTD
17.20%
6M
21.00%
1Y
39.22%
3Y*
26.55%
5Y*
16.27%
10Y*
12.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLPAX vs. TIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLPAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
7.24%16.64%11.30%13.87%-13.60%13.87%13.16%19.53%-4.59%16.71%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
17.20%37.01%13.48%18.28%-7.69%20.36%-0.40%18.01%-4.31%15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between BLPAX and TIBIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012

0.82

The correlation between BLPAX and TIBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLPAX vs. TIBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLPAX
BLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

TIBIX
TIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLPAX vs. TIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLPAXTIBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

4.76

-2.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.29

6.84

-3.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.96

-0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

7.48

-4.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.23

29.26

-17.03

BLPAX vs. TIBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is lower than the TIBIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLPAX and TIBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLPAXTIBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

4.76

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

1.47

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.94

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.76

+0.15

Drawdowns

BLPAX vs. TIBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLPAX drawdown since its inception was -23.21%, smaller than the maximum TIBIX drawdown of -48.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLPAX and TIBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLPAXTIBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.21%

-48.88%

+25.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-5.39%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.62%

-9.23%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.65%

-20.79%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.21%

-34.85%

+11.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.92%

-5.96%

+3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.38%

+0.24%

Volatility

BLPAX vs. TIBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) is 2.65%, while Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that BLPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLPAXTIBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

3.07%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

6.98%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.52%

8.46%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.41%

11.16%

-0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.83%

13.50%

-2.67%

BLPAX vs. TIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLPAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBIX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLPAX vs. TIBIX - Dividend Comparison

BLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than TIBIX's 5.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLPAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
5.44%5.83%3.59%2.30%6.01%4.97%2.56%3.83%4.69%3.48%3.66%3.69%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
5.06%5.83%5.67%4.89%5.89%5.33%4.31%4.46%4.77%4.52%4.14%4.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLPAX and TIBIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIBIX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to BLPAX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLPAX dropped -23.21% vs TIBIX's -48.88%.

TIBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.76 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLPAX and TIBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer