PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLPAX vs. ANWPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLPAX vs. ANWPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BLPAX having a 7.24% return and ANWPX slightly higher at 7.27%. Over the past 10 years, BLPAX has underperformed ANWPX with an annualized return of 9.17%, while ANWPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.46% annualized return.


BLPAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.65%
YTD
7.24%
6M
8.21%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
9.17%

ANWPX

1D
0.07%
1M
4.89%
YTD
7.27%
6M
8.88%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
13.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLPAX vs. ANWPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLPAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
7.24%16.64%11.30%13.87%-13.60%13.87%13.16%19.53%-4.59%16.71%
ANWPX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A
7.27%21.33%16.76%24.63%-25.92%17.64%33.42%30.10%-5.99%28.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BLPAX and ANWPX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012

0.94

The correlation between BLPAX and ANWPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLPAX vs. ANWPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLPAX
BLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ANWPX
ANWPX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ANWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ANWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLPAX vs. ANWPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLPAXANWPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

1.60

+0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.29

2.29

+1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.29

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

1.85

+0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.23

7.80

+4.43

BLPAX vs. ANWPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the ANWPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLPAX and ANWPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLPAXANWPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

1.60

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.51

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.76

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.67

+0.24

Drawdowns

BLPAX vs. ANWPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLPAX drawdown since its inception was -23.21%, smaller than the maximum ANWPX drawdown of -52.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLPAX and ANWPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLPAXANWPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.21%

-52.34%

+29.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-11.48%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.62%

-17.93%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.65%

-34.45%

+13.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.21%

-34.45%

+11.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.92%

-8.11%

+5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

2.72%

-1.10%

Volatility

BLPAX vs. ANWPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) is 2.65%, while American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that BLPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANWPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLPAXANWPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

3.93%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

10.80%

-3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.52%

13.42%

-4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.41%

17.21%

-6.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.83%

17.83%

-7.00%

BLPAX vs. ANWPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLPAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than ANWPX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLPAX vs. ANWPX - Dividend Comparison

BLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, less than ANWPX's 6.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANWPX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A
6.13%6.57%5.13%5.36%4.16%7.01%4.13%3.67%7.59%5.50%3.86%6.14%
BLPAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
5.44%5.83%3.59%2.30%6.01%4.97%2.56%3.83%4.69%3.48%3.66%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BLPAX and ANWPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ANWPX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to BLPAX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLPAX dropped -23.21% vs ANWPX's -52.34%.

BLPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLPAX and ANWPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer