PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLOX vs. RSBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLOX vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLOX achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 18.74% return.


BLOX

1D
0.93%
1M
-12.07%
6M
-15.20%
YTD
-1.51%
1Y
-9.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSBY

1D
0.72%
1M
-0.53%
6M
17.67%
YTD
18.74%
1Y
17.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLOX vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BLOX
Nicholas Crypto Income ETF
-1.51%8.17%
RSBY
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF
18.74%-1.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOX and RSBY is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLOX vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLOX
BLOX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
BLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

RSBY
RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLOX vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLOXRSBYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.27

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

2.27

-2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.40

5.30

-5.70

BLOX vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLOX and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLOX vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOX drawdown since its inception was -47.09%, which is greater than RSBY's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOX and RSBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLOXRSBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.09%

-23.32%

-23.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.09%

-7.95%

-39.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.91%

-6.28%

-25.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.17%

-13.32%

-5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.41%

3.40%

+21.01%

Volatility

BLOX vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) has a higher volatility of 12.40% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 3.20%. This indicates that BLOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLOXRSBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.40%

3.20%

+9.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.81%

8.40%

+32.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.49%

11.40%

+43.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.55%

13.36%

+40.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.55%

13.36%

+40.19%

BLOX vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLOX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLOX vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

BLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.13%, more than RSBY's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BLOX
Nicholas Crypto Income ETF
48.13%22.69%0.00%
RSBY
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF
1.74%2.07%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLOX and RSBY have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLOX has higher volatility (12.40%) compared to RSBY (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOX dropped -47.09% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 17.98% vs -9.66% for BLOX. On fees, RSBY is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 17.98% return vs -9.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSBY is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BLOX.

BLOX has the higher dividend yield at 48.13%, compared with 1.74% for RSBY.

BLOX is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for BLOX and 0.98% for RSBY.

RSBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLOX and RSBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer