BLOX vs. EZPZ
BLOX (Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BLOX is actively managed, while EZPZ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLOX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.
Performance
BLOX vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLOX achieves a 16.52% return, which is significantly higher than EZPZ's -28.21% return.
BLOX
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- 10.59%
- YTD
- 16.52%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- -18.55%
- YTD
- -28.21%
- 6M
- -33.71%
- 1Y
- -39.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOX vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | 16.52% | 9.24% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -28.21% | -14.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLOX and EZPZ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLOX vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank
BLOX
EZPZ
BLOX vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLOX | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | -0.61 | +1.15 |
Drawdowns
BLOX vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLOX drawdown since its inception was -47.09%, smaller than the maximum EZPZ drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOX and EZPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLOX | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.09% | -52.38% | +5.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.45% | -51.59% | +32.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.53% | -21.72% | +3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.44% | — |
Volatility
BLOX vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLOX | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.44% | 46.83% | +6.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.44% | 47.65% | +5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.44% | 47.65% | +5.79% |
BLOX vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLOX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLOX vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison
BLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.81%, while EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | 36.81% | 22.69% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLOX and EZPZ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BLOX.
BLOX has the higher dividend yield at 36.81%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for BLOX and 0.19% for EZPZ.
Find the right allocation for BLOX and EZPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer