BLOK vs. TSXU
BLOK (Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - BLOK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Amplify, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). BLOK is actively managed, while TSXU is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLOK charges 0.71%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
BLOK vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
BLOK
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 30.79%
- 3Y*
- 51.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOK vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 16.21% | -15.17% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLOK and TSXU is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLOK vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
BLOK
TSXU
BLOK vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLOK | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLOK | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 4.53 | -4.05 |
Drawdowns
BLOK vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than TSXU's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLOK | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.33% | -35.62% | -37.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.16% | -0.92% | -9.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.08% | -10.56% | -15.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.23% | — | — |
Volatility
BLOK vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLOK | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.29% | 78.68% | -40.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.36% | 78.68% | -36.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.97% | 78.68% | -39.71% |
BLOK vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLOK has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLOK vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 0.62% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLOK and TSXU have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLOK is cheaper at 0.71% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLOK is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.62% for BLOK.
BLOK is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BLOK and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for BLOK and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer