BLOK vs. QBF
BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) and QBF (Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly) are both Blockchain funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BLOK returned 6.60% vs -42.47% for QBF. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BLOK charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QBF.
Performance
BLOK vs. QBF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 4.30% return, which is significantly higher than QBF's -28.48% return.
BLOK
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 4.30%
- 1Y
- 6.60%
- 3Y*
- 35.59%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.03%
QBF
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- 6M
- -25.66%
- YTD
- -28.48%
- 1Y
- -42.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -28.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.12M | $10.76M | $19.14M | |
| $57.51K | $91.87K | $133.71K |
BLOK vs. QBF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 4.30% | 19.47% |
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly | -28.48% | -14.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLOK and QBF is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | 0.69 |
The correlation between BLOK and QBF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLOK vs. QBF — Risk / Return Rank
BLOK
QBF
BLOK vs. QBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLOK | QBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.73 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | -0.90 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.07 | -1.45 | +1.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLOK vs. QBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than QBF's maximum drawdown of -48.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and QBF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLOK | QBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.33% | -48.71% | -24.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.64% | -48.71% | +13.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -46.54% | +27.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.87% | -19.89% | -5.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.28% | 30.27% | -12.99% |
Volatility
BLOK vs. QBF - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) has a higher volatility of 13.31% compared to Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) at 6.30%. This indicates that BLOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLOK | QBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.31% | 6.30% | +7.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.77% | 19.72% | +11.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.21% | 27.26% | +12.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.50% | 28.70% | +13.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.06% | 28.70% | +10.36% |
BLOK vs. QBF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLOK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than QBF's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLOK vs. QBF - Dividend Comparison
BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than QBF's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 0.82% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly | 1.93% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLOK and QBF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLOK has higher volatility (13.31%) compared to QBF (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOK dropped -73.33% vs QBF's -48.71%.
On 1-year performance, BLOK leads with 6.60% vs -42.47% for QBF. On fees, BLOK is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, QBF has been the lower-risk option at 6.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 6.60% return vs -42.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLOK is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBF.
QBF has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.82% for BLOK.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BLOK and 0.79% for QBF.
BLOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLOK and QBF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer