BLOK vs. MNRS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) and MNRS (Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both Blockchain funds. BLOK is actively managed, while MNRS is passively managed. Over the past year, BLOK returned 6.60% vs 39.29% for MNRS. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BLOK charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MNRS.

Performance

BLOK vs. MNRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 4.30% return, which is significantly lower than MNRS's 15.24% return.

BLOK

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: -3.77%
• 6M: -0.08%
• YTD: 4.30%
• 1Y: 6.60%
• 3Y*: 35.59%
• 5Y*: 10.22%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.03%

MNRS

• 1D: -2.54%
• 1M: -6.16%
• 6M: 0.46%
• YTD: 15.24%
• 1Y: 39.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	$12.12M	$10.76M	$19.14M
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	$301.29K	$286.50K	$542.86K

BLOK vs. MNRS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	4.30%	23.02%
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	15.24%	14.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOK and MNRS is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2025	0.90

The correlation between BLOK and MNRS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BLOK vs. MNRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BLOK

BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 12
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 13
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 11

MNRS

MNRS Risk / Return Rank: 22
MNRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MNRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
MNRS Omega Ratio Rank: 26
MNRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
MNRS Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BLOK vs. MNRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLOK	MNRS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	0.39	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	1.08	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.12	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.03	0.52	-0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.07	0.96	-0.89

BLOK vs. MNRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLOK Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the MNRS Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLOK and MNRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLOK vs. MNRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than MNRS's maximum drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and MNRS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLOK	MNRS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.33%	-56.70%	-16.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.64%	-56.70%	+21.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.37%	-36.48%	+17.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.87%	-23.92%	-1.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.28%	30.84%	-13.56%

Volatility

BLOK vs. MNRS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) is 13.31%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) has a volatility of 29.70%. This indicates that BLOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLOK	MNRS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.31%	29.70%	-16.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.77%	56.91%	-26.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.21%	75.89%	-35.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.50%	72.74%	-30.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.06%	72.74%	-33.68%

BLOK vs. MNRS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLOK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MNRS's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLOK vs. MNRS - Dividend Comparison

BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than MNRS's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	0.82%	0.72%	6.00%	1.15%	0.00%	14.31%	1.88%	2.05%	1.30%
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.47%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLOK and MNRS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, BLOK and MNRS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BLOK or MNRS?

MNRS has higher volatility (29.70%) compared to BLOK (13.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOK dropped -73.33% vs MNRS's -56.70%.

Which ETF is better, BLOK or MNRS?

On 1-year performance, MNRS leads with 39.29% vs 6.60% for BLOK. On fees, MNRS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BLOK has been the lower-risk option at 13.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLOK or MNRS?

Over the 1-year period, MNRS has performed better with a 39.29% return vs 6.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLOK or MNRS?

MNRS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BLOK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLOK or MNRS?

BLOK has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.47% for MNRS.

What is the main difference between BLOK and MNRS?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BLOK and 0.59% for MNRS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MNRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.