BLOK vs. CORZZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BLOK (Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Amplify, while CORZZ (Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants) is a stock. Over the past year, BLOK returned 30.79% vs 146.16% for CORZZ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

BLOK vs. CORZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly lower than CORZZ's 100.14% return.

BLOK

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: 7.72%
• YTD: 16.21%
• 6M: 7.24%
• 1Y: 30.79%
• 3Y*: 51.34%
• 5Y*: 11.96%
• 10Y*: —

CORZZ

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 38.11%
• YTD: 100.14%
• 6M: 76.79%
• 1Y: 146.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLOK vs. CORZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF	16.21%	32.64%	74.71%
CORZZ Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants	100.14%	3.71%	754.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOK and CORZZ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.65

The correlation between BLOK and CORZZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BLOK vs. CORZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLOK

BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 21
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 18

CORZZ

CORZZ Risk / Return Rank: 84
CORZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CORZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
CORZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CORZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CORZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLOK vs. CORZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLOK	CORZZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	2.01	-1.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	2.61	-1.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.33	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	3.64	-2.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.90	6.91	-5.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BLOK vs. CORZZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLOK Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the CORZZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLOK and CORZZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLOK	CORZZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	2.01	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	2.48	-1.99

Drawdowns

BLOK vs. CORZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than CORZZ's maximum drawdown of -65.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and CORZZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLOK	CORZZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.33%	-65.20%	-8.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.64%	-40.39%	+4.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.16%	0.00%	-10.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.08%	-21.57%	-4.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.23%	21.25%	-5.02%

Volatility

BLOK vs. CORZZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) is 10.59%, while Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ) has a volatility of 19.79%. This indicates that BLOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CORZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLOK	CORZZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.59%	19.79%	-9.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.55%	47.31%	-18.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.29%	73.59%	-35.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.36%	97.36%	-55.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.97%	97.36%	-58.39%

Dividends

BLOK vs. CORZZ - Dividend Comparison

BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while CORZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF	0.62%	0.72%	6.00%	1.15%	0.00%	14.31%	1.88%	2.05%	1.30%
CORZZ Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLOK and CORZZ in my portfolio?

BLOK and CORZZ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLOK or CORZZ?

CORZZ has higher volatility (19.79%) compared to BLOK (10.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOK dropped -73.33% vs CORZZ's -65.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CORZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.