BLOK vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLOK is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Amplify, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. BLOK is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BLOK returned 34.40%/yr vs -31.71%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.73, they often move in opposite directions. BLOK charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

BLOK vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.73% return.

BLOK

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -10.80%
• 6M: -10.95%
• YTD: 3.01%
• 1Y: -3.65%
• 3Y*: 34.40%
• 5Y*: 11.59%
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -0.52%
• 6M: 36.51%
• YTD: 24.73%
• 1Y: 64.56%
• 3Y*: -31.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLOK vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	3.01%	32.64%	53.12%	99.62%	-18.27%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	24.73%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOK and BITI is -0.72, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.73

The correlation between BLOK and BITI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.73 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BLOK vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLOK

BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 9
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 9

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 53
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLOK vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLOK	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	1.47	-1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.14	2.04	-1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.25	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	2.57	-2.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.22	6.36	-6.58

BLOK vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLOK Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLOK and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLOK vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLOK	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.33%	-92.16%	+18.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.64%	-25.28%	-10.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.64%	-84.63%	+48.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.36%	-86.38%	+66.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.90%	-68.42%	+42.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.98%	10.18%	+6.80%

Volatility

BLOK vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) is 8.48%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that BLOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLOK	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.48%	10.69%	-2.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.57%	34.09%	-4.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.90%	44.07%	-5.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.52%	52.21%	-9.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.98%	52.21%	-13.23%

BLOK vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLOK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLOK vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than BITI's 15.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.59%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	0.83%	0.72%	6.00%	1.15%	0.00%	14.31%	1.88%	2.05%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLOK and BITI in my portfolio?

BLOK and BITI have a correlation of -0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLOK or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to BLOK (8.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOK dropped -73.33% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, BLOK or BITI?

On 3-year performance, BLOK leads with 34.40% vs -31.71% for BITI. On fees, BLOK is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BLOK has been the lower-risk option at 8.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLOK or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 34.40% return vs -31.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLOK or BITI?

BLOK is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLOK or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.59%, compared with 0.83% for BLOK.

What is the main difference between BLOK and BITI?

BLOK is categorized as Blockchain, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BLOK and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.