BLOK vs. AS
BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) is Blockchain fund actively managed by Amplify, while AS (Amer Sports, Inc) is a stock. Over the past year, BLOK returned 24.42% vs -5.21% for AS. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BLOK vs. AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than AS's -5.06% return.
BLOK
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 24.42%
- 3Y*
- 50.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- —
AS
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 8.18%
- YTD
- -5.06%
- 6M
- -7.56%
- 1Y
- -5.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOK vs. AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 12.57% | 32.64% | 69.91% |
AS Amer Sports, Inc | -5.06% | 33.58% | 108.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLOK and AS is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLOK vs. AS — Risk / Return Rank
BLOK
AS
BLOK vs. AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and Amer Sports, Inc (AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLOK | AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.01 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | -0.18 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.49 | -0.36 | +1.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLOK vs. AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than AS's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLOK | AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.33% | -40.71% | -32.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.64% | -28.78% | -6.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.97% | -15.49% | +2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.03% | -13.29% | -12.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.41% | 14.56% | +1.85% |
Volatility
BLOK vs. AS - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) has a higher volatility of 13.34% compared to Amer Sports, Inc (AS) at 10.17%. This indicates that BLOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLOK | AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.34% | 10.17% | +3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.02% | 29.10% | +0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.18% | 41.31% | -2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.53% | 49.55% | -7.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.05% | 49.55% | -10.50% |
Dividends
BLOK vs. AS - Dividend Comparison
BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, while AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS Amer Sports, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 0.64% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLOK and AS have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLOK has higher volatility (13.34%) compared to AS (10.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOK dropped -73.33% vs AS's -40.71%.
BLOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLOK and AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer