PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLKC vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLKC vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BLKC

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSP

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.77%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.18%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLKC vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BLKC
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF
-12.03%13.79%46.83%128.84%-63.43%-8.11%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.70%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%6.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BLKC and RSP is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between BLKC and RSP has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BLKC vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLKC
RSP

Financial Services

36.7%
14.5%

Technology

29.5%
19.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
9.9%

Communication Services

4.5%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
6.5%

Industrials

2.2%
14.1%

Energy

1.4%
4.5%

Healthcare

1.0%
11.0%

Basic Materials

-

4.1%

Real Estate

-

6.0%

Utilities

-

6.1%

Financial Services

BLKC
36.7%
RSP
14.5%

Technology

BLKC
29.5%
RSP
19.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BLKC
7.3%
RSP
9.9%

Communication Services

BLKC
4.5%
RSP
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

BLKC
2.6%
RSP
6.5%

Industrials

BLKC
2.2%
RSP
14.1%

Energy

BLKC
1.4%
RSP
4.5%

Healthcare

BLKC
1.0%
RSP
11.0%

Basic Materials

BLKC

-

RSP
4.1%

Real Estate

BLKC

-

RSP
6.0%

Utilities

BLKC

-

RSP
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLKC vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLKC

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLKC vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLKC vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLKCRSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

Drawdowns

BLKC vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLKCRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

Volatility

BLKC vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLKCRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

BLKC vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLKC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLKC vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

BLKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLKC
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF
4.39%7.72%19.66%1.92%5.40%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLKC and RSP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BLKC.

BLKC has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.

BLKC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RSP is S&P 500. BLKC tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BLKC and 0.20% for RSP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLKC and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer