BLGR vs. HYP

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BLGR (Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF) and HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLGR charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HYP.

Performance

BLGR vs. HYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLGR achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly lower than HYP's 26.28% return.

BLGR

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -2.87%
• YTD: 5.42%
• 6M: 4.04%
• 1Y: 20.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYP

• 1D: -2.48%
• 1M: -1.42%
• YTD: 26.28%
• 6M: 21.28%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLGR vs. HYP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF	5.42%	1.47%
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	26.28%	-6.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BLGR and HYP is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025	0.66

Return for Risk

BLGR vs. HYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLGR

BLGR Risk / Return Rank: 38
BLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
BLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
BLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 39
BLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
BLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 39

HYP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLGR vs. HYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLGR	HYP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.40	—	—

Drawdowns

BLGR vs. HYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLGR drawdown since its inception was -14.08%, smaller than the maximum HYP drawdown of -19.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLGR and HYP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLGR	HYP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.08%	-19.58%	+5.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.77%	-7.32%	+1.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.52%	-6.44%	+3.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.81%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLGR	HYP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.70%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.07%	43.24%	-27.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.04%	43.24%	-27.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.04%	43.24%	-27.20%

BLGR vs. HYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLGR has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than HYP's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLGR vs. HYP - Dividend Comparison

BLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, more than HYP's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF	0.24%	0.17%
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	0.11%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLGR and HYP in my portfolio?

BLGR and HYP have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLGR or HYP?

On fees, BLGR is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLGR or HYP?

BLGR is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLGR or HYP?

BLGR has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.11% for HYP.

What is the main difference between BLGR and HYP?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Golden Eagle. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BLGR and 0.85% for HYP.