BLDX vs. TOLZ
BLDX (Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) and TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. BLDX is actively managed, while TOLZ is passively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BLDX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for TOLZ.
Performance
BLDX vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BLDX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TOLZ
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- 6M
- 9.13%
- YTD
- 12.23%
- 1Y
- 15.09%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $75.90K | $90.31K | $290.80K | |
| $2.70M | $1.60M | $1.37M |
BLDX vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BLDX Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 5.78% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 7.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLDX and TOLZ is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLDX vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank
BLDX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TOLZ
BLDX vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (BLDX) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLDX | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.93 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.18 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLDX vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLDX drawdown since its inception was -8.26%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDX and TOLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLDX | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -39.33% | +31.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.89% | -2.32% | -1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.56% | -6.58% | +3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.85% | — |
Volatility
BLDX vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLDX | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.88% | 10.77% | +6.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 14.03% | +2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 16.24% | +0.64% |
BLDX vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLDX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLDX vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison
BLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than TOLZ's 2.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDX Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.97% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLDX and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BLDX.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.97% for BLDX.
They also come from different issuers: Impax Asset Management and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BLDX and 0.46% for TOLZ.
Find the right allocation for BLDX and TOLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer