BLDR vs. CDNS
BLDR (Builders FirstSource, Inc.) and CDNS (Cadence Design Systems, Inc.) are both stocks. BLDR operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials), while CDNS operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BLDR returned 20.07%/yr vs 31.92%/yr for CDNS. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BLDR vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLDR achieves a -28.93% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's 26.12% return. Over the past 10 years, BLDR has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 20.07%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 31.92% annualized return.
BLDR
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- -28.93%
- 6M
- -31.96%
- 1Y
- -34.50%
- 3Y*
- -15.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 20.07%
CDNS
- 1D
- 4.80%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 26.12%
- 6M
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- 32.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.80%
- 5Y*
- 25.79%
- 10Y*
- 31.92%
BLDR vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDR Builders FirstSource, Inc. | -28.93% | -28.01% | -14.38% | 157.31% | -24.30% | 110.02% | 60.61% | 132.91% | -49.93% | 98.63% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 26.12% | 4.03% | 10.31% | 69.55% | -13.80% | 36.59% | 96.70% | 59.52% | 3.97% | 65.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLDR and CDNS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2005 | 0.36 |
The correlation between BLDR and CDNS shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BLDR:
$8.03B
CDNS:
$107.91B
BLDR:
$2.63
CDNS:
$4.28
BLDR:
27.77
CDNS:
92.03
BLDR:
0.55
CDNS:
19.49
BLDR:
2.01
CDNS:
12.37
BLDR:
$14.82B
CDNS:
$5.53B
BLDR:
$4.43B
CDNS:
$4.91B
BLDR:
$1.06B
CDNS:
$1.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLDR vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank
BLDR
CDNS
BLDR vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLDR | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.18 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 1.14 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 2.42 | -3.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLDR | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | 0.85 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.72 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.94 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.24 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
BLDR vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLDR drawdown since its inception was -96.78%, roughly equal to the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDR and CDNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLDR | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.78% | -93.13% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.51% | -28.85% | -26.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.55% | -29.05% | -39.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.55% | -29.59% | -38.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.55% | -32.12% | -36.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.37% | -5.32% | -60.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.87% | -39.64% | -8.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.59% | 13.60% | +14.99% |
Volatility
BLDR vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) is 13.13%, while Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a volatility of 16.58%. This indicates that BLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLDR | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 16.58% | -3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.98% | 31.69% | +2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.94% | 39.02% | +8.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.20% | 36.20% | +9.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.71% | 34.13% | +13.58% |
Dividends
BLDR vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
Neither BLDR nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BLDR vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Builders FirstSource, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BLDR vs. CDNS - Profitability Comparison
BLDR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported a gross profit of 928.97M and revenue of 3.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.3%.
CDNS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.41B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.
BLDR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.52M and revenue of 3.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.
CDNS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 431.33M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.
BLDR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported a net income of -47.41M and revenue of 3.29B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.
CDNS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 335.66M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BLDR and CDNS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDNS has higher volatility (16.58%) compared to BLDR (13.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLDR dropped -96.78% vs CDNS's -93.13%.
CDNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLDR and CDNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer