BLDG vs. VFMV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV).

BLDG and VFMV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BLDG is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Sep 24, 2020. VFMV is an actively managed fund by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 13, 2018.

Performance

BLDG vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BLDG vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	-0.71%	4.26%	8.18%	1.76%	-14.66%	22.47%	15.37%
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF	2.90%	10.52%	16.91%	8.86%	-5.73%	20.75%	12.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLDG achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than VFMV's 2.90% return.

BLDG

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -7.55%
• YTD: -0.71%
• 6M: -4.12%
• 1Y: 6.29%
• 3Y*: 5.76%
• 5Y*: 2.30%
• 10Y*: —

VFMV

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -4.26%
• YTD: 2.90%
• 6M: 3.50%
• 1Y: 7.75%
• 3Y*: 12.83%
• 5Y*: 9.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLDG vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLDG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.

BLDG

Cambria Global Real Estate ETF

VFMV

Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF

Return for Risk

BLDG vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLDG

BLDG Risk / Return Rank: 24
BLDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BLDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
BLDG Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BLDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BLDG Martin Ratio Rank: 26

VFMV

VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 33
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 31
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLDG vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLDG	VFMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	0.63	-0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	0.94	-0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.13	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.58	0.80	-0.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.11	3.69	-1.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BLDG vs. VFMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is comparable to the VFMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLDG and VFMV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLDG	VFMV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47	0.63	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	0.80	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.66	-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between BLDG and VFMV is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BLDG vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison

BLDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than VFMV's 2.04% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	6.11%	7.46%	7.97%	4.99%	3.99%	10.40%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF	2.04%	2.12%	1.46%	2.20%	2.08%	1.31%	2.14%	2.43%	2.29%

Drawdowns

BLDG vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLDG drawdown since its inception was -27.25%, smaller than the maximum VFMV drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDG and VFMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLDG	VFMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.25%	-33.64%	+6.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.80%	-9.63%	-1.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.25%	-15.41%	-11.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.75%	-4.26%	-4.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.44%	-3.69%	-5.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	2.09%	+0.89%

Volatility

BLDG vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 3.43%. This indicates that BLDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLDG	VFMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	3.43%	+0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.34%	6.62%	+0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.30%	12.28%	+1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.22%	11.77%	+3.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.60%	14.34%	+1.26%