BLDG vs. SUSA
BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) and SUSA (iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLDG is a REIT fund actively managed by Cambria, while SUSA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Select Index. BLDG is actively managed, while SUSA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLDG returned 2.80%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for SUSA. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLDG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SUSA.
Performance
BLDG vs. SUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLDG achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than SUSA's 9.38% return.
BLDG
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 4.13%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.80%
- 10Y*
- —
SUSA
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 9.38%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 25.21%
- 3Y*
- 19.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.02%
BLDG vs. SUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 11.81% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | -14.66% | 22.47% | 15.25% |
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF | 9.38% | 15.72% | 22.43% | 23.88% | -21.38% | 30.45% | 16.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLDG and SUSA is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BLDG and SUSA has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLDG vs. SUSA — Risk / Return Rank
BLDG
SUSA
BLDG vs. SUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLDG | SUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.33 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 2.42 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.59 | 10.46 | -5.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLDG vs. SUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLDG drawdown since its inception was -27.25%, smaller than the maximum SUSA drawdown of -53.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDG and SUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLDG | SUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.25% | -53.93% | +26.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -9.71% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.57% | -19.30% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.25% | -28.23% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.42% | +2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.18% | -7.24% | -1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 2.25% | +0.61% |
Volatility
BLDG vs. SUSA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) is 3.71%, while iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that BLDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLDG | SUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 4.67% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.38% | 10.22% | -1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.20% | 12.85% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.27% | 17.40% | -2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 18.18% | -2.66% |
BLDG vs. SUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLDG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SUSA's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLDG vs. SUSA - Dividend Comparison
BLDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, more than SUSA's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.42% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF | 0.84% | 0.89% | 1.15% | 1.32% | 1.52% | 0.98% | 1.17% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.40% | 1.56% | 1.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLDG and SUSA have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SUSA has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to BLDG (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLDG dropped -27.25% vs SUSA's -53.93%.
On 5-year performance, SUSA leads with 11.37% vs 2.80% for BLDG. On fees, SUSA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BLDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SUSA has performed better with a 11.37% return vs 2.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SUSA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BLDG.
BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.42%, compared with 0.84% for SUSA.
BLDG is categorized as REIT, while SUSA is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BLDG and 0.25% for SUSA.
SUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLDG and SUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer