BLDG vs. INFR

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) and INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLDG is a REIT fund actively managed by Cambria, while INFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the RARE Global Infrastructure Index. BLDG is actively managed, while INFR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BLDG returned 10.36%/yr vs 5.42%/yr for INFR. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.

Performance

BLDG vs. INFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLDG achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than INFR's 1.41% return.

BLDG

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 4.13%
• YTD: 11.81%
• 6M: 12.26%
• 1Y: 14.51%
• 3Y*: 10.36%
• 5Y*: 2.80%
• 10Y*: —

INFR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 2.70%
• 1Y: 7.18%
• 3Y*: 5.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLDG vs. INFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	11.81%	4.26%	8.18%	1.76%	-0.41%
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.41%	24.00%	-6.23%	5.20%	-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between BLDG and INFR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022	0.56

The correlation between BLDG and INFR shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BLDG vs. INFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLDG

BLDG Risk / Return Rank: 34
BLDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
BLDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
BLDG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
BLDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
BLDG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

INFR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLDG vs. INFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLDG	INFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	0.93	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	1.36	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.21	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	1.28	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.59	3.97	+0.62

BLDG vs. INFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the INFR Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLDG and INFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLDG vs. INFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLDG drawdown since its inception was -27.25%, which is greater than INFR's maximum drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDG and INFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLDG	INFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.25%	-19.28%	-7.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.08%	-6.43%	-3.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.57%	-18.55%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.70%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.18%	-4.91%	-4.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	2.04%	+0.82%

Volatility

BLDG vs. INFR - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) at 0.00%. This indicates that BLDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLDG	INFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.71%	0.00%	+3.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.38%	3.73%	+4.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.20%	8.90%	+2.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.27%	14.24%	+1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.52%	14.24%	+1.28%

BLDG vs. INFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BLDG and INFR have an expense ratio of 0.59%.

Dividends

BLDG vs. INFR - Dividend Comparison

BLDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, while INFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	5.42%	7.46%	7.97%	4.99%	3.99%	10.40%	0.59%
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	2.49%	2.52%	2.36%	3.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLDG and INFR in my portfolio?

BLDG and INFR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLDG or INFR?

BLDG has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to INFR (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLDG dropped -27.25% vs INFR's -19.28%.

Which ETF is better, BLDG or INFR?

On 3-year performance, BLDG leads with 10.36% vs 5.42% for INFR. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, INFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLDG or INFR?

Over the 3-year period, BLDG has performed better with a 10.36% return vs 5.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLDG or INFR?

BLDG and INFR have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLDG or INFR?

BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.42%, compared with 2.49% for INFR.

What is the main difference between BLDG and INFR?

BLDG is categorized as REIT, while INFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and ClearBridge.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.