PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLDG vs. DTRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLDG vs. DTRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF (DTRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLDG achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly higher than DTRE's 7.30% return.


BLDG

1D
0.24%
1M
2.31%
YTD
10.88%
6M
11.11%
1Y
13.96%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*

DTRE

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
7.30%
6M
7.58%
1Y
9.50%
3Y*
5.74%
5Y*
-1.24%
10Y*
2.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLDG vs. DTRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BLDG
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
10.88%4.26%8.18%1.76%-14.66%22.47%15.25%
DTRE
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF
7.30%8.32%-9.71%13.89%-26.53%27.43%16.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BLDG and DTRE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

0.80

The correlation between BLDG and DTRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLDG vs. DTRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLDG
BLDG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BLDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLDG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
BLDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLDG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

DTRE
DTRE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLDG vs. DTRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF (DTRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLDGDTREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

0.99

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.88

2.98

+1.90

BLDG vs. DTRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the DTRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLDG and DTRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLDG vs. DTRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLDG drawdown since its inception was -27.25%, smaller than the maximum DTRE drawdown of -72.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDG and DTRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLDGDTREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.25%

-72.26%

+45.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-9.61%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.57%

-20.65%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.25%

-34.62%

+7.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-12.19%

+11.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.14%

-16.87%

+7.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

3.19%

-0.32%

Volatility

BLDG vs. DTRE - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF (DTRE) have volatilities of 4.61% and 4.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLDGDTREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

4.78%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.06%

10.61%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

13.82%

-2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.28%

18.11%

-2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.55%

18.52%

-2.97%

BLDG vs. DTRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLDG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DTRE's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLDG vs. DTRE - Dividend Comparison

BLDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than DTRE's 4.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLDG
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
5.30%7.46%7.97%4.99%3.99%10.40%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DTRE
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF
4.19%3.42%3.75%2.56%2.49%2.64%0.79%4.97%3.38%3.07%4.16%1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLDG and DTRE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTRE has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to BLDG (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLDG dropped -27.25% vs DTRE's -72.26%.

On 5-year performance, BLDG leads with 3.09% vs -1.24% for DTRE. On fees, BLDG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BLDG has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BLDG has performed better with a 3.09% return vs -1.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BLDG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DTRE.

BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.30%, compared with 4.19% for DTRE.

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BLDG and 0.60% for DTRE.

BLDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLDG and DTRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer