PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLCV vs. PVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLCV vs. PVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCV achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly lower than PVAL's 12.96% return.


BLCV

1D
-1.81%
1M
0.18%
YTD
6.47%
6M
5.91%
1Y
18.72%
3Y*
18.17%
5Y*
10Y*

PVAL

1D
-0.45%
1M
1.91%
YTD
12.96%
6M
12.02%
1Y
31.50%
3Y*
23.34%
5Y*
16.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLCV vs. PVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BLCV
Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF
6.47%19.96%12.63%14.56%
PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
12.96%24.13%19.30%16.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BLCV and PVAL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023

0.89

The correlation between BLCV and PVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

BLCV vs. PVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLCV
PVAL

Technology

18.3%
17.1%

Financial Services

14.9%
11.8%

Industrials

14.2%
11.4%

Healthcare

11.6%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
9.9%

Communication Services

9.5%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
5.1%

Energy

6.0%
7.3%

Utilities

4.4%
4.3%

Real Estate

2.7%
2.0%

Basic Materials

2.4%
4.6%

Technology

BLCV
18.3%
PVAL
17.1%

Financial Services

BLCV
14.9%
PVAL
11.8%

Industrials

BLCV
14.2%
PVAL
11.4%

Healthcare

BLCV
11.6%
PVAL
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BLCV
9.9%
PVAL
9.9%

Communication Services

BLCV
9.5%
PVAL
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

BLCV
6.1%
PVAL
5.1%

Energy

BLCV
6.0%
PVAL
7.3%

Utilities

BLCV
4.4%
PVAL
4.3%

Real Estate

BLCV
2.7%
PVAL
2.0%

Basic Materials

BLCV
2.4%
PVAL
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLCV vs. PVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PVAL
PVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLCV vs. PVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLCVPVALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.52

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

4.38

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.49

16.61

-8.12

BLCV vs. PVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLCV Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the PVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCV and PVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLCV vs. PVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCV drawdown since its inception was -13.44%, smaller than the maximum PVAL drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCV and PVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLCVPVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.44%

-16.64%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-7.22%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.44%

-15.42%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-1.08%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-3.00%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

1.90%

+0.56%

Volatility

BLCV vs. PVAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) is 3.36%, while Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) has a volatility of 3.55%. This indicates that BLCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLCVPVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

3.55%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

8.61%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.65%

11.13%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.81%

15.29%

-2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.81%

15.23%

-2.42%

BLCV vs. PVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BLCV and PVAL have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Dividends

BLCV vs. PVAL - Dividend Comparison

BLCV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BLCV
Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF
1.01%1.37%1.63%1.02%0.00%0.00%
PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
0.97%1.00%1.34%1.33%0.59%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLCV and PVAL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PVAL has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to BLCV (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLCV dropped -13.44% vs PVAL's -16.64%.

On 3-year performance, PVAL leads with 23.34% vs 18.17% for BLCV. Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. On volatility, BLCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PVAL has performed better with a 23.34% return vs 18.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BLCV and PVAL have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

BLCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.97% for PVAL.

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Putnam.

PVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLCV and PVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer