BLCV vs. KWIN

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BLCV (Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF) and KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. BLCV is actively managed, while KWIN is passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLCV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for KWIN.

Performance

BLCV vs. KWIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BLCV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KWIN

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.19%
• 6M: 1.23%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLCV vs. KWIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	6.47%	4.80%
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF	1.66%	0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BLCV and KWIN is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

BLCV vs. KWIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BLCV	KWIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-1.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.37%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLCV	KWIN	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.14%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	4.14%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	4.14%	—

BLCV vs. KWIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than KWIN's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLCV vs. KWIN - Dividend Comparison

Neither BLCV nor KWIN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	1.01%	1.37%	1.63%	1.02%
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLCV and KWIN in my portfolio?

BLCV and KWIN have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLCV or KWIN?

On fees, KWIN is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLCV or KWIN?

KWIN is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BLCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLCV or KWIN?

BLCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.

What is the main difference between BLCV and KWIN?

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for BLCV and 0.51% for KWIN.