BLCR vs. LCTU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) and LCTU (BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLCR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while LCTU is a ESG fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BLCR returned 41.08% vs 22.01% for LCTU. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLCR charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for LCTU.

Performance

BLCR vs. LCTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) and BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCR achieves a 16.77% return, which is significantly higher than LCTU's 6.71% return.

BLCR

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: 16.77%
• 6M: 15.78%
• 1Y: 41.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LCTU

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: -0.76%
• YTD: 6.71%
• 6M: 5.72%
• 1Y: 22.01%
• 3Y*: 19.65%
• 5Y*: 11.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLCR vs. LCTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	16.77%	30.93%	17.07%	13.54%
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	6.71%	16.96%	24.00%	14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between BLCR and LCTU is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023	0.92

The correlation between BLCR and LCTU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

BLCR vs. LCTU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLCR	LCTU
Technology	34.3%	37.8%
Communication Services	14.6%	9.9%
Industrials	13.7%	8.3%
Financial Services	12.5%	11.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	10.3%
Healthcare	7.6%	8.6%
Energy	2.2%	3.0%
Basic Materials	2.2%	1.9%
Utilities	1.6%	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.5%
Real Estate	-	2.2%

Return for Risk

BLCR vs. LCTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 82
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 88

LCTU

LCTU Risk / Return Rank: 54
LCTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
LCTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
LCTU Omega Ratio Rank: 53
LCTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
LCTU Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLCR vs. LCTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) and BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLCR	LCTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	1.73	+0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	2.39	+0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.31	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	2.36	+1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.20	10.18	+8.02

BLCR vs. LCTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLCR Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the LCTU Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCR and LCTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLCR vs. LCTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCR drawdown since its inception was -21.29%, smaller than the maximum LCTU drawdown of -25.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCR and LCTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLCR	LCTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.29%	-25.93%	+4.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.26%	-9.38%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-2.85%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-6.27%	+4.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	2.17%	+0.09%

Volatility

BLCR vs. LCTU - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) at 4.59%. This indicates that BLCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLCR	LCTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.32%	4.59%	+1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.18%	10.10%	+3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.45%	12.82%	+3.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.67%	17.23%	+0.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.67%	17.03%	+0.64%

BLCR vs. LCTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCR has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than LCTU's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLCR vs. LCTU - Dividend Comparison

BLCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than LCTU's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.29%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	0.98%	1.02%	1.27%	1.46%	1.63%	2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLCR and LCTU in my portfolio?

BLCR and LCTU have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLCR or LCTU?

BLCR has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to LCTU (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLCR dropped -21.29% vs LCTU's -25.93%.

Which ETF is better, BLCR or LCTU?

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 41.08% vs 22.01% for LCTU. On fees, LCTU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, LCTU has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLCR or LCTU?

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 41.08% return vs 22.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLCR or LCTU?

LCTU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for BLCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLCR or LCTU?

LCTU has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.29% for BLCR.

What is the main difference between BLCR and LCTU?

BLCR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while LCTU is ESG. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for BLCR and 0.15% for LCTU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.