BLCN vs. YCS
BLCN (Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - BLCN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren NASDAQ Blockchain Economy Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLCN returned -9.28%/yr vs 23.50%/yr for YCS. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLCN charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
BLCN vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLCN achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 9.78% return.
BLCN
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 9.96%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 25.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.95%
- 5Y*
- -9.28%
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 31.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
BLCN vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCN Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF | 12.69% | -3.69% | 5.62% | 21.09% | -51.76% | 4.86% | 60.60% | 33.94% | -18.99% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.78% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | 2.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLCN and YCS is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2018 | 0.04 |
The correlation between BLCN and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLCN vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
BLCN
YCS
BLCN vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLCN | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.35 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 3.79 | -2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.85 | 11.86 | -10.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLCN vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLCN drawdown since its inception was -67.51%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCN and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLCN | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.51% | -49.56% | -17.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.53% | -8.30% | -21.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.26% | -23.05% | -22.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.51% | -27.32% | -40.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.31% | 0.00% | -45.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.37% | -19.88% | -10.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.96% | 2.65% | +11.31% |
Volatility
BLCN vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) has a higher volatility of 13.86% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.22%. This indicates that BLCN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLCN | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.86% | 2.22% | +11.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.35% | 12.19% | +15.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.78% | 16.96% | +19.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.18% | 21.10% | +14.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.30% | 18.96% | +12.34% |
BLCN vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLCN has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLCN vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
BLCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCN Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF | 2.67% | 3.01% | 0.67% | 0.54% | 1.28% | 0.56% | 0.58% | 1.45% | 1.16% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLCN and YCS have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLCN has higher volatility (13.86%) compared to YCS (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLCN dropped -67.51% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.50% vs -9.28% for BLCN. On fees, BLCN is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.50% return vs -9.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLCN is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
BLCN has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
BLCN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. BLCN tracks Siren NASDAQ Blockchain Economy Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BLCN and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLCN and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer